Can a Compliance Officer Also Be a Gaming Manager? 5 Critical Risks You Must Know

Compliance Officer

I’ve been asked this question several times over the past few weeks.

For many small to medium licensed venues (registered clubs and hotels), it’s common to ask whether one person can perform multiple roles—specifically, whether a Compliance Officer can also act as a Gaming Manager.

The short answer is yes. In many cases, there are limited options due to the size of the venue.

However, combining the Compliance Officer and Gaming Manager roles comes with clear risks and expectations that must be managed to meet obligations under the AML/CTF framework and relevant state-based gaming legislation.

What the Law and Guidance Say About a Compliance Officer

Under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006, reporting entities (including clubs that operate EGMs) must appoint a Compliance Officer to oversee the AML/CTF program. 

AUSTRAC guidance does not prohibit the Compliance Officer from holding another role, such as Gaming Manager. However, it does clearly state: 

  • The Compliance Officer must have appropriate authority, independence, and access to information  
  • They must be able to challenge decisions and escalate issues without conflict  
  • They must ensure ongoing compliance, monitoring, and reporting  

This is where the risk sits when combining roles. 

Understanding the Two Roles 

AML/CTF Compliance Officer – Core Responsibilities 

The Compliance Officer is responsible for: 

  • Developing and maintaining the AML/CTF program  
  • Ensuring customer due diligence (CDD, OCDD, ECDD) is completed  
  • Overseeing transaction monitoring and suspicious matter reporting (SMRs)  
  • Reporting to senior management and the Board  
  • Liaising with AUSTRAC  
  • Ensuring staff are trained and aware of obligations  

This role is governance, oversight, and assurance-focused. 

Gaming Manager – Core Responsibilities 

The Gaming Manager is responsible for: 

  • Day-to-day operation of electronic gaming machines (EGMs)  
  • Compliance with state legislation (e.g. NSW gaming regulations)  
  • Managing payouts, machine operations, and staff  
  • Ensuring responsible gambling practices  
  • Handling customer interactions and incidents  

This role is operational and customer-focused.  

5 Critical Risks When a Compliance Officer Is Also a Gaming Manager

Combining the roles of Compliance Officer and Gaming Manager creates several risks, primarily around independence and objectivity.

1. Conflict of Interest

The Compliance Officer may be reviewing their own decisions, reducing objectivity.

2. Weak Customer Due Diligence

A Gaming Manager handling payouts may also be responsible for assessing whether identification checks were sufficient.

3. Compromised Suspicious Matter Reporting

Balancing customer experience with compliance obligations can delay or prevent proper SMR reporting.

4. Reduced Oversight

Transaction monitoring may lack independent review if handled by the same person.

5. Compliance Becoming Secondary

Operational pressures may take priority over AML/CTF responsibilities.

When Combining Roles Can Work 

For smaller venues, combining roles can be acceptable if controls are in place. 

Practical Control Measures 

Clear Role Separation (Even if It’s the Same Person)

Be clear when the individual is acting as:

  • Gaming Manager (operations)
  • Compliance Officer (oversight)

Example:
A monthly AML/CTF review where the individual formally switches roles and documents findings.

Secondary Oversight 

Involve:

  • CEO / General Manager
  • Finance Manager
  • Board or Audit Committee

Example:
All SMR decisions or high-risk customers are reviewed by a second person.

Strong Reporting Framework 

Regular reporting to the Board, including:  

  • High-risk customers  
  • Transaction monitoring outcomes  
  • SMRs submitted  
  • Training completion  

Use of Systems (e.g. CIRT, EGM reports) 

  • Automate tracking where possible  
  • Ensure reports are reviewed, not just generated  

Simple Test for Your Venue 

Ask the following: 

  • Can the Compliance Officer objectively review gaming decisions?  
  • Is there someone else reviewing high-risk decisions?  
  • Is AML/CTF given enough time and priority?  
  • Is the person performing these duties clear about the different responsibilities?  

If the answer is “no” to any of the above, separation or additional controls are required. 

Key Takeaway for Venue Operators 

Combining the Compliance Officer and Gaming Manager roles is not prohibited, but it is high-risk if not managed properly.  

But it doesn’t mean it can’t be.  

The key is understanding this: 

  • The Gaming Manager runs the floor. 
  • The Compliance Officer questions what happens on the floor. 

If one person is doing both, your system must ensure they can step back, challenge decisions, and demonstrate good decision-making.  

Need Help Reviewing Your Compliance Officer Structure?

If you’re unsure whether your Compliance Officer setup meets regulatory expectations, you can contact our team for guidance:
https://www.chdpartners.com.au/contact-us/

Previous Post
Hearing Protection: It Only Works If It’s Worn Properly
Next Post
How to Identify Noise Hazards in the Workplace: 5 Practical Steps for Small Businesses